Second Circuit· 11/5/2007
United States v. Rommy
Citations
- 506 F.3d 108
- 39 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 703
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25732
- 2007 WL 3243813
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the occurrence of an overt act in the district of venue must be “reasonably foreseeable to a conspirator”
- rejecting the argument that venue analysis is affected by whether “the listener [during a telephone call establishing venue] is a confederate, an innocent third party, or an undercover agent”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobs, Walker, Raggi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Garnett v. Undercover Officer C0039Second Circuit· 2016-09-30· cited 226×
- United States v. CoplanSecond Circuit· 2012-11-29· cited 199×
- Tolliver v. SheetsSixth Circuit· 2010-02-22· cited 118×
- United States v. VaynerSecond Circuit· 2014-10-03· cited 95×
- United States v. IodiceSecond Circuit· 2008-05-08· cited 74×
- United States v. OdehSecond Circuit· 2008-11-24· cited 73×
- United States v. Kirk Tang YukSecond Circuit· 2018-03-15· cited 67×
- United States v. RoyerSecond Circuit· 2008-12-17· cited 66×
- United States v. DireFourth Circuit· 2012-05-23· cited 52×
- Mora v. People of State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2008-04-24· cited 52×
- United States v. LopezSecond Circuit· 2008-11-10· cited 49×
- United States v. AlgeeSixth Circuit· 2010-03-24· cited 49×
- United States v. TzolovSecond Circuit· 2011-06-15· cited 40×
- United States v. MoloneyFirst Circuit· 2012-07-06· cited 38×
- United States v. LangeSecond Circuit· 2016-08-15· cited 38×
- United States v. Rutigliano, Lesniewski, BaranSecond Circuit· 2015-06-22· cited 37×
- United States v. WakerSecond Circuit· 2008-07-22· cited 36×
- United States v. MooreSecond Circuit· 2012-02-22· cited 32×
- United States v. DavisSecond Circuit· 2012-08-08· cited 32×
- Sublet, Harris & Monge-Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-23· cited 30×
Cites
94 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 1,260×
- Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,205×
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 1,098×
- Mitchell v. EsparzaSupreme Court· 2003-11-03· cited 1,091×
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 1,013×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.