United States v. Rommy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the occurrence of an overt act in the district of venue must be “reasonably foreseeable to a conspirator”
• rejecting the argument that venue analysis is affected by whether “the listener [during a telephone call establishing venue] is a confederate, an innocent third party, or an undercover agent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).