United States v. Olga Gaydos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a vacant and uninhabitable building did not affect interstate commerce where the owner had no intention of ever making it habitable or rentable again
• explaining that significant connections to 13 out-of-state factors could satisfy the interstate commerce nexus under § 844(i)
• explaining that when a criminal defendant has not “fil[ed] a timely motion for a judgment of acquittal ... we review the sufficiency of the evidence under a plain error standard”
• stating the need for a case-by-case inquiry where statute contains a jurisdictional element to “ensure ... that the [activity] in question affects interstate commerce”
• noting that the Supreme Court has “opined that the local rental of an apartment unit is an element of a much broader commercial market in rental Order Page 24 properties to which congressional power to regulate extends”
• stating the need for a case-by-case inquiry where statute contains a jurisdictional element to\ensure . . . that the [activity] in question affects interstate commerce\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).