United States v. William Henry Hester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the mere buyer-seller instruction is not appropriate when there is evidence of multiple drug transactions as opposed to a single isolated sale
• “The district court’s sua sponte ruling on the admissibility of coconspirator evidence before the jury . . . was indeed an unfortunate error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).