Skip to main content
· 6/8/2012

United States v. Howard Grant

Citations

  • 683 F.3d 639
  • 2012 WL 2054936
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he government must do more than pile inference upon inference upon which to base a conspiracy charge.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “The jury retains the sole authority to weigh any conflicting evidence and to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.” (quotation omitted)
  • “The jury ‘retains the sole authority to weigh any conflicting evidence and to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’” (quoting United States v. Loe, 262 F.3d 427, 432 (5th Cir. 2001))
  • “The jury ‘retains the sole authority to weigh any conflicting evidence and to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’” (quoting United States v. Loe, 262 F.3d 427, 432 (5th Cir. 2001)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Dennis, Higginson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.