United States v. Gurleon Maxi Jackson, Talmadge Alvin Whitley and Nathan Phillip Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that Rule 32 “gives [a defendant] the right to present witnesses on his own behalf” because “no cases . . . have recognized such a right and we are aware of none”
• “The government has offered no evidence indicating that [the defendant] was present during conversations in which the conspiracy was discussed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).