United States v. Mark Kuhrt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The proper role of the deliberate ignorance instruction is not as a backup or supplement in a case that hinges on a defendant’s actual knowledge.”
• “Because there was ample evidence supporting . . . that Appellant[] actively committed criminal fraud—the testimony . . . was not indispensable, nor was its exclusion harmful error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).