United States v. Umawa Oke Imo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict
• inferring knowledge from proximity to unlawful acts and complicity in the continuation of that illegal activity
• inferring a defendant’s (1) knowledge of a health care fraud conspiracy from his proximity to unlawful acts and (2) complicity from the continued unlawful activities
• inferring knowledge from proximity to unlawful acts and complicity in the continuation of that illegal activity
• inferring knowledge from proximity to unlawful acts and complicity in the continuation of that illegal activity
• “The district court found that even assuming [the defendant] knew that he would not be fully reimbursed, he sent Medicare and Medicaid bills with the intention that he would be paid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).