United States v. Caroline Njoku

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to raise a multiplicity objection pretrial forfeits that argument on appeal
• instructing that we view the evidence “in the light most favorable to the government,” draw all inferences “in support of the jury’s verdict,” and “ask whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt”
• affirming application of two level enhancement where a home health care company billed Medicare for ineligible patients after nurses signed questionnaires without first examining the patient
• instructing that we view the evidence “in the light most favorable to the government,” draw all inferences “in support of the jury’s verdict,” and “ask whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt”
• instructing that we view the evidence “in the light most favorable to the government,” draw all inferences “in support of the jury’s verdict,” and “ask whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt”
• affirming application of two level enhancement where a home health care company billed Medicare for ineligible pa tients after nurses signed questionnaires without first examining the patient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).