United States v. Hargrove

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plain error is proper standard of review for claim, raised for first time on appeal, that district court committed substantive error by considering improper sentencing factor
• explaining that a statement that a suspect is not under arrest is entitled to some weight but is less significant than a statement that he is free to leave
• finding that any limitations on the defendant’s freedom of movement during the search were only minor, and therefore, did not weigh toward a finding that the defendant was in custody
• pointing out that Lynn called for plain error review when a procedural sentencing error is raised for the first time on appeal
• noting the importance of “secur[ing] the site for conducting a search pursuant to a valid search warrant”
• pointing out that Lynn called for plain error review when a procedural sentencing error is raised for the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).