United States v. Gerson Aplicano-Oyuela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in Rule 11 context, plain error requires showing that defendant would not have pleaded guilty but for court’s error
• reviewing for plain error “sentencing issue that was not properly preserved in the district court”
• “A court’s sentencing rationale . . . can support both imprisonment and supervised release.”
• “[W]hen a defendant contests the validity of a guilty plea that he did not seek to withdraw, we . . . review that challenge solely for plain error.”
• “A court’s sentencing rationale . . . can support both imprisonment and supervised release.”
• “A court’s sentencing rationale . . . can support both imprisonment and supervised release.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).