United States v. Austin Webb, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that revocation sentence “should sanction primarily the defendant’s breach of trust” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing that, “in fashioning a revocation sentence, the court should sanction primarily the defendant’s breach of trust” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing that deterrence is appropriate factor for court to consider in imposing revocation sentence
• holding that appellant “failed to justify a remand for resentencing” when he did “not argue[] that he would have received a lower [revocation] sentence had the district court not” considered 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) factors
• recognizing that revocation sentence “should sanction primarily the defendant’s breach of trust”
• noting that factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) are intertwined with factors courts are expressly authorized to consider under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).