United States v. Guerra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the defendant’s taking $300 from a service station was sufficient to invoke federal jurisdiction and citing the $170 taken in a previous case in which we also found jurisdiction
• “[A]n individual defendant’s conduct need not substantially affect commerce precisely because the Hobbs Act regulates general conduct — robberies and extortion — which in the 21 Case: 18-13969 Date Filed: 07/30/2020 Page: 22 of 38 aggregate affects commerce substantially.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).