United States v. David Anthony Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidence of the defendant’s intent is not required to prove that his robberies had an impact on interstate commerce, ... [but] ... is still probative ... of whether his actions would have had the ‘natural consequence[ ]’ of affecting such commerce” (last alteration in original)
• “Drug dealing is a commercial enterprise and robberies of drug dealers threaten that enterprise; that is enough for a federal court to exercise jurisdiction under the Hobbs Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).