Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 6/23/1971

United States v. Oscar E. Hyde

Citations

  • 448 F.2d 815
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on fair inferences from the record in a Hobbs Act extortion case
  • \The distinction from bribery is therefore. . . the fear and lack of voluntariness on the part of the victim\
  • “The distinction from bribery is therefore . . . the fear and lack of voluntariness on the part of the victim”
  • state attorney general and aides extorting moneys from insurance companies
  • state attorney general and aides extorting moneys from insurance companies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rives, Gewin, Coleman, Godbold, Wisdom, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

132 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

113 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.