United States v. Culbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Congressional prohibition of conduct already criminalized under state law does not necessarily disturb federal-state comity
• finding that Congressional prohibition of conduct already criminalized under state law does not necessarily disturb federal-state comity
• explaining that the words of the Hobbs Act “do not lend themselves to restrictive interpretation”
• explaining that the words of the Hobbs Act “do not lend themselves to restrictive interpretation”
• explaining that the words of the Hobbs Act “do not lend themselves to restrictive interpretation”
• declining to limit the Hobbs Act’s scope to an undefined category of conduct termed “racketeering”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).