Supreme Court· 3/28/1978

United States v. Culbert

Citations

435 U.S. 371
98 S. Ct. 1112
55 L. Ed. 2d 349
1978 U.S. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that Congressional prohibition of conduct already criminalized under state law does not necessarily disturb federal-state comity
finding that Congressional prohibition of conduct already criminalized under state law does not necessarily disturb federal-state comity
explaining that the words of the Hobbs Act “do not lend themselves to restrictive interpretation”
explaining that the words of the Hobbs Act “do not lend themselves to restrictive interpretation”
explaining that the words of the Hobbs Act “do not lend themselves to restrictive interpretation”
declining to limit the Hobbs Act’s scope to an undefined category of conduct termed “racketeering”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan, Marshall, Members

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

156 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Culbert

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.