United States v. Fruchter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, under RICO forfeiture provisions, that “proceeds derived from conduct forming the basis of a charge of which the defendant was acquitted can be counted as ‘proceeds’ of racketeering activity”
• rejecting arguments that Sixth Amendment applies to forfeiture and that Booker and Blakely require proof beyond reasonable doubt in forfeiture determinations; further holding that “Libretti remains the determinative decision”
• “Libretti remains the determinative decision. Accordingly, the district court did not err when it applied a preponderance standard to the determination of Braun’s forfeiture,” in determining criminal forfeiture based on RICO conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Fruchter

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Fruchter
  Second Circuit· 2005-06-14· cited 25×
• United States v. Fruchter
  S.D. New York· 2000-07-11· cited 9×
• United States v. Fruchter
  Second Circuit· 2005-06-14· cited 2×