United States v. Jerome Crosby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prudential doctrines of plain error and harmless error are applied “in the customary manner” to determination of whether resentencing is warranted under Booker
• directing that \[t]he applicable Guidelines range is normally to be determined in the same manner as before Booker [ ]\
• stating that, in order to aid in appellate review, district courts should explain their reasons for deciding to impose a Guidelines sentence or a non-Guidelines sentence
• discussing district court’s obligation to “consider the Guidelines and all of the other factors listed in section 3553(a)” when imposing sentence after Booker/Fanfan
• stating that district courts must consider applicable policy statements
• reiterating that we do not require “robotic incantations” of the statutory factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).