United States v. Abdurahman M. Alamoudi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a substitute-asset forfeiture order does not “increase the punishment” or “the penalty at all”
• upholding substitute assets order entered a year and a half after initial consent order of forfeiture
• “Section 853(p) is not discretionary.... [w]hen the Government cannot reach the property initially subject to forfeiture, federal law requires a court to substitute assets for the unavailable tainted property”
• “[Section] 2461(c) instructs the court to follow the procedures set forth in [21 U.S.C. § 853]. Pursuant to § 853(p), a court ‘shall order the forfeiture of any other property of the defendant’ if it finds that [the requirements of § 853(p)(1) are met].” (emphases omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).