Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/11/1996

United States v. Dinome

Citations

  • 86 F.3d 277
  • 1996 WL 309974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that “contemplated” harm is required and approving portion of jury instruction that stated that “ ‘Intent to defraud’ means to act ... with ... the purpose of causing some financial or property loss to another” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mahoney, Oakes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Dinome

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.