Sixth Circuit· 4/4/2011
United States v. Freeman
Citations
- 640 F.3d 180
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6785
- 2011 WL 1226091
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding that there was evidence of unlawful intent when the defendant exchanged guns for drugs in the wee hours of the morning
- specifying that plain error review applies where the defendant did not raise a procedural sentencing error below
- distinguishing Sharp because Sharp involved a conspiracy charge and holding that restitution does set a statutory maximum in some cases: “the amount causally linked to the offense of conviction” (quoting United States v. Gordon, 480 F.3d 1205, 1210 (10th Cir. 2007))
- \[Defendant's] sale of firearms to his heroin dealer in the wee hours of the morning in exchange for heroin and cash gave him reason to know or have reason to believe that his heroin dealer 'intended to use or dispose of the firearm unlawfully.' \
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilman, Gibbons, Cook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. EversSixth Circuit· 2012-02-10· cited 102×
- United States v. Jesse PawlakSixth Circuit· 2016-05-13· cited 99×
- United States v. WilliamsSixth Circuit· 2011-05-11· cited 95×
- United States v. Keith ChurnSixth Circuit· 2015-09-10· cited 79×
- United States v. Ernest AdamsSixth Circuit· 2017-10-11· cited 74×
- United States v. Kevin DavisSixth Circuit· 2014-05-28· cited 72×
- United States v. Anthony TaylorSixth Circuit· 2015-08-25· cited 70×
- Scott Callahan v. Fed. Bureau of PrisonsSixth Circuit· 2020-07-16· cited 64×
- United States v. Rodney HenrySixth Circuit· 2016-04-08· cited 54×
- United States v. Michael PeppelSixth Circuit· 2013-02-15· cited 35×
- United States v. Benjamin PepperEighth Circuit· 2014-03-20· cited 25×
- United States v. Jervis DavisFourth Circuit· 2013-05-01· cited 22×
- United States v. Erica HamptonSixth Circuit· 2013-10-21· cited 21×
- United States v. Michael GrundySixth Circuit· 2016-12-22· cited 6×
- United States v. Wayne FugateSixth Circuit· 2020-07-10· cited 6×
- United States v. Dominique McKenzieSixth Circuit· 2022-05-03· cited 6×
- United States v. Michael Winans, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 2014-03-17
- Richard Vowell v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2019-08-16
- United States v. Malcolm HoyleSixth Circuit· 2025-08-06
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- United States v. VonnerSixth Circuit· 2008-02-07· cited 1,354×
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-21· cited 871×
- United States v. Henry A. BosticSixth Circuit· 2004-06-17· cited 681×
- United States v. Ricky A. CaruthersSixth Circuit· 2006-08-11· cited 258×
- United States v. JerossSixth Circuit· 2008-04-04· cited 245×
- United States v. BrooksSixth Circuit· 2011-01-06· cited 173×
- United States v. PensonSixth Circuit· 2008-05-27· cited 120×
- Brown v. SmithSixth Circuit· 2008-12-31· cited 112×
- United States v. JuarezFifth Circuit· 2010-11-12· cited 101×
- United States v. Rachel Shannon Sosebee (03-1923) and Jack P. Farris (03-2219)Sixth Circuit· 2005-08-12· cited 94×
- United States v. Robert Douglas TreadwaySixth Circuit· 2003-05-16· cited 78×
- United States v. Raysheen SharpSixth Circuit· 2006-04-05· cited 74×
- United States v. Rhonda FitchSixth Circuit· 2002-03-08· cited 69×
- United States v. ElsonSixth Circuit· 2009-08-21· cited 68×
- United States v. Otis Cutler, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1994-09-30· cited 64×
- United States v. KrattSixth Circuit· 2009-09-02· cited 62×
- United States v. Christopher GillSixth Circuit· 2003-10-31· cited 59×
- United States v. Margaret Ann GordonTenth Circuit· 2007-03-28· cited 55×
- Project Vote/Voting for America, Inc. v. LongFourth Circuit· 2012-06-15· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.