United States v. Elson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “funds the victims have not received cannot reduce or offset the amount of losses the defendant is required to repay” (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• applying a similar rule in the context of criminal conspiracy
• “Because Elson was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea rather than by a jury, the court should look to the plea agreement, the plea colloquy, and other statements made by the parties to determine the scope of the ‘offense of conviction’ for purposes of restitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).