Sixth Circuit· 8/21/2009

United States v. Elson

Citations

577 F.3d 713
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18848
2009 WL 2568192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“funds the victims have not received cannot reduce or offset the amount of losses the defendant is required to repay” (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
applying a similar rule in the context of criminal conspiracy
“Because Elson was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea rather than by a jury, the court should look to the plea agreement, the plea colloquy, and other statements made by the parties to determine the scope of the ‘offense of conviction’ for purposes of restitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Clay, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Elson

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.