United States v. Evers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a minor victim’s legal guardian qualified as a “victim” under “the plain language” of § 2259(c)
• finding that the “loss of a sex offender as a babysitter” was not a foreseeable result of a child pornography offense
• finding that the “loss of a sex offender, as a babysitter” was not a foreseeable result of a child pornography offense
• concluding that proximate cause was not established
• concluding that proximate cause was not established
• finding a proximate cause requirement but declining to choose whether to adopt the McDaniels or Monzel rationale as they are “complementary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).