United States v. Eustorgio Pena-Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the cumulative effect of all the instances of undue interruption were prejudicial and required a new trial
• finding judge “went too far” where he 11 continually interrupted counsel, threatened and intimidated witness and counsel, and 12 usurped prosecutor’s role
• directly attacking the credibility of and threatening witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).