Skip to main content
· 6/26/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eural WILLS, II, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 88 F.3d 704
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 7519
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4720
  • 44 Fed. R. Serv. 1357
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15302
  • 1996 WL 346654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim that striking two African American jurors was not enough for a prima facie case, particularly when several African American jurors were empaneled
  • whether jury instructions adequately covered defense theory of case reviewed de novo
  • accomplice instruction not required when immunity instruction given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Beezer, Rymer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.