United States v. Darrick Morgan, AKA D. Morgan, United States of America v. Tyra Goodman, AKA Tyra Johnson, AKA T. Eileen Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding 22 questioning that was “inappropriately extensive and suggestive” did not warrant 23 reversal in light of the court’s curative instructions given both before and after 24 questioning
• defendant falsified loan applications and subsequently defaulted on inadequately secured loans
• “[W]e may consider the 2001 amendment when interpreting the 1995 version of the Sentencing Guidelines only if that amendment is a clarification of existing law rather than a substantive change in the law.” (citing U.S.S.G. § 1B1.11(b)(2))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).