Skip to main content
· 9/19/1994

George Maiden, Jr. v. William Bunnell John Van De Kamp

Citations

  • 35 F.3d 477
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 13158
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7167
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25657
  • 1994 WL 506998

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that crossing the line from prosecution to defense does not necessarily create a conflict of interest
  • former prosecutor, who had successfully prosecuted the defendant in an unrelated burglary case three years earlier, did not have an actual conflict where the record was devoid of evidence suggesting that the two cases were “substantially related”
  • petitioner bears burden of indicating specific adverse effect in counsel’s conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Trott, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.