State v. Mollberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[w]e fully agree with the approach adopted by the Federal courts\ for violations of R. 41
• finding that a warrantless search was justified due to the presence of a third party who could destroy evidence
• labeling the failure to leave a copy of the warrant with the defendant a “minor and technical” defect
• agreeing with the approach adopted by federal courts for violations of Fed.R.Crim.P. 41

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).