Skip to main content
· 8/22/2006

Rutledge v. United States

Citations

  • 72 Fed. Cl. 396
  • 2006 U.S. Claims LEXIS 241
  • 2006 WL 2424733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a writ of prohibition is an appropriate remedy to prevent a lower court from proceeding contrary to the mandate of a superior court”
  • “[A]n example of an extraordinary circumstance * * * is an intervening Supreme Court case that states a rule of law in conflict with the mandate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.