Skip to main content
First Circuit· 7/6/2006

United States v. Maher

Citations

  • 454 F.3d 13
  • 70 Fed. R. Serv. 640
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16846
  • 2006 WL 1846572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Confrontation Clause violation was harmless in part due to significant physical evidence of possession with an intent to distribute, including drugs in amounts too large to be explained by personal use, paraphernalia, and related equipment
  • explaining that testimony admitted under Rule 702 must be disclosed to the defense before trial, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(G), and must satisfy the heightened reliability criteria of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
  • “It is a violation of a suspect’s Fourth Amendment rights for a 21 consensual search to exceed the scope of the consent given.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Hug, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Maher

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.