Skip to main content
· 11/4/2002

United States v. Eunice Husband

Citations

  • 312 F.3d 247
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 22851
  • 2002 WL 31445336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying, as a major limitation on the scope of a remand, the fact that “any issue that could have been but was not raised on appeal is waived and thus not remanded”
  • a party “ ‘cannot use the accident of remand as an opportunity to reopen waived issues’ ”
  • “[T]his court does not remand issues ... when those issues have been waived or decided”
  • “[A]ny issue conclusively decided by this court on the first appeal is not remanded.”
  • “[A]ny issue conclusively decided by this court on the first appeal is not remanded.”
  • “[A]ny issue conclusively decided by this court on the first appeal is not remanded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.