Beazer East, Inc. v. Mead Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that jurisdiction does not attach 3 “where the alleged claim under the Constitution or federal statutes clearly appears to be immaterial and made solely for the purpose of obtaining jurisdiction[.]”
• describing the Supreme Court’s discussion in Arbaugh v. Y & H Corporation, 546 U.S. 500, 511 (2006), about the imprecise use of the term
• “any issue that could have been but was not raised on appeal is waived and thus not remanded”
• Jurisdiction does not attach “where the alleged claim under the Constitution or federal statutes clearly appears to be immaterial and made solely for the purpose of obtaining jurisdiction[,]”
• Jurisdiction does not attach “where the alleged claim under the Constitution or federal statutes clearly appears to be immaterial and made solely for the purpose of obtaining jurisdiction[.]”
• “any issue that could have been but was not raised on appeal is waived”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).