Fourth Circuit· 12/28/2007
Doe v. Chao
Citations
- 511 F.3d 461
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29879
- 2007 WL 4554545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district court may not reconsider questions resolved by an appellate court's mandate
- describing “a few exceptional circumstances” permitting deviation from mandate rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams, Wilkinson, Michael
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moore v. BennetteFourth Circuit· 2008-02-28· cited 692×
- Hensley Ex Rel. North Carolina v. PriceFourth Circuit· 2017-11-17· cited 159×
- Pennfield Oil Co. v. WinstromNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-07-18· cited 125×
- Dotson v. Pfizer, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2009-03-04· cited 112×
- DirecTV, Inc. v. RawlinsFourth Circuit· 2008-04-21· cited 63×
- United States v. MatthewsFirst Circuit· 2011-04-29· cited 51×
- Kennedy v. St. Joseph's Ministries, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2011-09-14· cited 48×
- United States v. Malek LassiterFourth Circuit· 2024-03-15· cited 40×
- United States v. Giuseppe PileggiFourth Circuit· 2013-01-02· cited 38×
- JTH Tax, Incorporated v. Gregory AimeFourth Circuit· 2021-01-04· cited 33×
- Jama v. Esmor Correctional Services, Inc.Third Circuit· 2009-08-12· cited 32×
- Diaz v. Jiten Hotel Management, Inc.First Circuit· 2013-12-18· cited 32×
- Estate of Cummings Ex Rel. Montoya v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2018-01-29· cited 27×
- Anthony Mangum v. S. HallembaekFourth Circuit· 2018-12-12· cited 17×
- Jaffé v. Samsung Electronics Co. (In Re Qimonda AG)E.D. Virginia· 2012-05-07· cited 15×
- Cibula Ex Rel. J.A.C. v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 2012-01-09· cited 14×
- United States v. FieldsFourth Circuit· 2009-01-14· cited 13×
- Lula Williams v. Matt MartorelloFourth Circuit· 2023-01-24· cited 9×
- Triton Marine Fuels, Ltd. v. M/V Pacific ChukotkaD. Maryland· 2009-11-30· cited 8×
- Sherley v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2011-07-27· cited 7×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court· 1992-12-14· cited 3,072×
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court· 1939-04-24· cited 1,255×
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1996-07-09· cited 452×
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court· 1948-05-24· cited 398×
- Doe v. ChaoSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 396×
- United States v. George Robert BellFourth Circuit· 1993-09-13· cited 385×
- Doe v. ChaoFourth Circuit· 2002-09-20· cited 144×
- United States v. Eunice HusbandSeventh Circuit· 2002-11-04· cited 142×
- United States v. Ronald ThrasherNinth Circuit· 2007-04-18· cited 109×
- Heather Sue Mercer v. Duke University, and Fred GoldsmithFourth Circuit· 2005-03-01· cited 108×
- United States v. HenryFifth Circuit· 1983-06-28· cited 97×
- Insurance Group Committee v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadSupreme Court· 1947-03-03· cited 80×
- United States v. Jackson C. O'dell, IIISixth Circuit· 2003-02-27· cited 68×
- Buck Doe, and Robert Doe Tays Doe Otis Doe Thomas Doe Joe Doe Charles Doe Dick Doe v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of LaborFourth Circuit· 2006-01-24· cited 45×
- Chandru Mirchandani v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1988-01-13· cited 39×
- Invention Submission Corp. v. DudasFourth Circuit· 2005-06-24· cited 28×
- Doe v. ChaoW.D. Virginia· 2004-11-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.