Skip to main content
· 8/22/2012

David H. Swanson v. United States

Citations

  • 692 F.3d 708
  • 2012 WL 3590857
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Indicating that flagging an issue in a sentencing memorandum is typically sufficient to preserve an issue and meet the basic Sixth Amendment level of competence; counsel can use professional judgment when deciding whether to raise the matter again orally at sentencing
  • “[T]he standard for plain error re- view and ineffective-assistance-of-counsel are comparable, and in some respects, plain error review may be less de- manding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sykes, Tinder, Deguilio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.