United States v. Estey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a five-month delay did not render information stale
• holding a five-month delay did not equate to staleness
• “[L]ike the defendants in both Griffin and Sewell, Estey ... knew how the [file-sharing] program operated”
• “Meanwhile, Estey does not offer evidence contrary to the FBI statements regarding the habits of child pornography collectors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).