Skip to main content
· 5/7/2002

United States v. Daniel Chrobak, Also Known as Dan Chrobak

Citations

  • 289 F.3d 1043
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 8731
  • 2002 WL 857548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a child-pornographer’s email address, when linked to a suspect, provides probable cause to search the suspect’s house
  • stating unambiguously that “[t]here are very few pictures of actual children engaged in sexual acts that are not child pornography”
  • stating unambiguously that “[t]here are very few pictures of actual children engaged in sexual acts that are not child pornography”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Lay, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.