United States v. Brent Englehart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing grant of motion to suppress because “we apply the law of the circuit as it existed at the time of the stop,” and “Eighth Circuit precedent at [that] time ... permitted a de minimis extension of a stop to employ a dog”
• reversing grant of motion to suppress because “we -12- apply the law of the circuit as it existed at the time of the stop,” and “Eighth Circuit precedent at [that] time . . . permitted a de minimis extension of a stop to employ a dog”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).