United States v. Walter E. Sewell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the government is entitled to prove its case by evidence of its own choice and is not required to accept the offer [to stipulate]”
• explaining that “the government is entitled to prove its case by evidence of its own choice and is not required to accept the offer [to stipulate]”
• explaining that “the government is entitled to prove its case by evidence of its own choice and is not required to accept the offer [to stipulate]”
• reversing the exclusion of 23 images proffered for publication for three or four seconds each
• presenting pornographic images stored on defendant's 11 computer was relevant to dispute defendant's claim that he was unaware his file-sharing program downloaded such images
• reversing the exclusion of 23 images proffered for -5- publication for three or four seconds each

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).