United States v. Edelkind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fraud proceeds are attributable to a defendant who controls disbursement of those proceeds even if he causes legal ownership to be lodged in another person or entity
• holding that omission from verdict form of requirement that - 28 - defrauded institution be one that was federally insured was not prejudicial error because jury was instructed as to that element and all other elements of the charged crime
• upholding jurisdiction where the direct victim was not FDIC insured after finding that Lehman Brothers, an FDIC-insured institution, was also victimized by the defendant's fraud
• stating that Congress intended the 2000 version of § 2461(c
• evidence “that a [bank] (not just its subsidiary) signed off on the loan” before mortgage company made it
• evidence \that a [bank] (not just its subsidiary) signed off on the loan\ before mortgage company made it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).