First Circuit· 10/31/2006

United States v. Edelkind

Citations

467 F.3d 791
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27045
2006 WL 3072238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that fraud proceeds are attributable to a defendant who controls disbursement of those proceeds even if he causes legal ownership to be lodged in another person or entity
holding that omission from verdict form of requirement that - 28 - defrauded institution be one that was federally insured was not prejudicial error because jury was instructed as to that element and all other elements of the charged crime
upholding jurisdiction where the direct victim was not FDIC insured after finding that Lehman Brothers, an FDIC-insured institution, was also victimized by the defendant's fraud
stating that Congress intended the 2000 version of § 2461(c
evidence “that a [bank] (not just its subsidiary) signed off on the loan” before mortgage company made it
evidence \that a [bank] (not just its subsidiary) signed off on the loan\ before mortgage company made it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Edelkind

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.