Skip to main content
· 7/31/2007

United States v. Portalla

Citations

  • 496 F.3d 23
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18184
  • 2007 WL 2178446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing cell phones as “essential tools of [the defendant’s] drug trade”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Cyr, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.