United States v. Christopher J. Stolee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the dis- trict court’s application of section 2F1.1(b)(8)(B) to a defendant who 6 UNITED STATES v. PENDERGRAPH was the sole owner and president of the corporation that received the fraudulently obtained funds
• affirming enhancement because, as the sole owner and president of the company, the defendant “arranged for the funds to be deposited into an account he controlled, and he directed how the funds were used” and therefore “indirectly bene-fitted from the illegally derived funds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).