· 3/20/2013
United States v. Erik Jenkins
Citations
- 712 F.3d 209
- 2013 WL 1149591
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a within-Guidelines sentence can nevertheless be substantively unreasonable if the district court considers an irrelevant factor
- relying on Wright to hold that age enhancement and vulnerable-victim enhancement both could be applied
- defendant downloaded over 100 virtual and actual child por- nography images and videos
- outlining abuse of discretion for within-Guidelines sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Southwick, Graves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.