Skip to main content
· 3/20/2013

United States v. Erik Jenkins

Citations

  • 712 F.3d 209
  • 2013 WL 1149591
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a within-Guidelines sentence can nevertheless be substantively unreasonable if the district court considers an irrelevant factor
  • relying on Wright to hold that age enhancement and vulnerable-victim enhancement both could be applied
  • defendant downloaded over 100 virtual and actual child por- nography images and videos
  • outlining abuse of discretion for within-Guidelines sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Southwick, Graves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.