Arizona Supreme Court· 5/10/2006

State v. Berger

Citations

134 P.3d 378
212 Ariz. 473
478 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
2006 Ariz. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “courts must accord substantial deference to the legislature and its policy judgments” in analyzing sentencing statutes
holding “these sentences do not violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment”
acknowledging ongoing harm to child pornography victims arising from continuing violation of their privacy and continuing disclosure of “ 'personal matters’ ”
discussing history of public interest litigation framework and legislative enactment abrogating and replacing it with AS 09.60.010
upholding an aggregate sentence of 200 years arising from the imposition of 20 consecutive terms of 10 years' imprisonment for sexual exploitation of a minor convictions
affirming a 200-year sentence for multiple acts of child pornography because “[a] defendant has no constitutional right to concurrent sentences for two separate crimes” (quoting State v. Jonas, 164 Ariz. 242, 792 P.2d 705, 712 (1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bales, Berch, McGregor, Ryan, Hurwitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Berger

49 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.