Illinois Supreme Court· 9/29/1978

People v. Park

Citations

380 N.E.2d 795
72 Ill. 2d 203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding inadmissible a witness’ opinion that a substance was marijuana because the opinion was based only on four years’ experience as a police officer and not chemical or microscopic analysis
holding inadmissible a witness’ opinion that a substance was marijuana because the opinion was based only on four years’ experience as a police officer and not chemical or microscopic analysis
finding testimony that a substance was marijuana insufficient to prove that it was in fact marijuana due, in part, to the availability of a simple test
finding testimony that a substance was marijuana insufficient to prove that it was in fact marijuana due, in part, to the availability of a simple test
finding testimony that a substance was marijuana insufficient to prove that it was in fact marijuana due, in part, to the availability of a simple test
finding testimony that a substance was marijuana insufficient to prove that it was in fact marijuana due, in part, to the availability of a simple test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Kluczynski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.