Fifth Circuit· 7/11/1997

United States v. Dupre

Citations

117 F.3d 810
1997 WL 385971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[P]roposed [jury] instructions do not preserve error on appeal, absent an objection specific to the counts at issue.”
\the ultimate decision whether . . . to take notice of an error not raised below must depend on the facts of the particular case\ (quoting United States v. Morales, 117 F.2d 1309, 1315 (5th Cir.1973))
“[U]nder Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, these proposed instructions do not preserve error on appeal, absent an objection specific to the counts at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Dennis, Fallon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Dupre

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.