United States v. Skilling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Accounting firms that serviced Enron’s books had less work, hotels had more open rooms, restaurants sold fewer meals, and so on”
• “Accounting firms that serviced Enron’s books had less work, hotels had more open rooms, restaurants sold fewer meals, and so on”
• “Accounting firms that serviced Enron’s books had less work, hotels had more open rooms, restaurants sold fewer meals, and so on”
• “Accounting firms that serviced Enron’s books had less work, hotels had more open rooms, restaurants sold fewer meals, and so on”
• rejecting a “proof in the pudding” argument that there must have been substantial interference where many potential witnesses declined to cooperate with the defense
• finding no Brady violation where there was no indication that government knowingly hid exculpatory evidence within voluminous disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).