Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 3/11/2010

United States v. Dodd

Citations

  • 598 F.3d 449
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5136
  • 2010 WL 814522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a defendant expected to receive a thing of value “by virtue of the fact of sharing (uploading) and receiving (downloading) shared images via the file-sharing network”
  • declining to “undertak[e] a fact-specific analysis” to determine if the conduct in the video was “sufficiently painful” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Gibson, Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.