United States v. Robert Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[U]se of the word ‘including’ . . . signals that the cited acts of distribution are illustrative rather than exhaus- tive.” (omission in original) (quoting United States v. Reingold, 731 F.3d 204, 228−29 (2d Cir. 2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).