United States v. Donald Eugene Creel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the enhancement for “distribution of child pornography does not require an offender to know that he made child pornography accessible to others”
• “No element of mens rea is expressed or implied by [the Sentencing Guidelines’ definition of distribution].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).