Skip to main content
· 8/20/2007

United States v. Geiner

Citations

  • 498 F.3d 1104
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19769
  • 2007 WL 2358678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a transaction constitutes any act of conducting business or any action involving two or more persons, and “distribution” under the CPPA is a subset of such a transaction
  • “In other words, [the defendant] made his files available to others on the network in anticipation of a faster downloading speed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Murphy, Lungstrum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.