United States v. Dock Richardson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that law enforcement officers had crossed the line from an investigative detention into an arrest when they placed the defendant in the back of a police car
• holding “that the taint of the illegal arrest vitiated [the defendant’s] consent and that the immediate fruits of the consent should have been suppressed”
• finding that placing a suspect into the back of a police car for twenty minutes without probable cause constituted a blatant constitutional violation
• holding that the reading of Miranda warnings is evidence of an arrest
• finding that placing a suspect into the back of a police car for twenty minutes without probable cause constituted a blatant constitutional violation
• finding that placing a suspect into the back of a police car for twenty minutes without probable cause constituted a blatant constitutional violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).